UBLOCK ORIGIN NOT BLOCKING POP UPS PLUS

UBLOCK ORIGIN NOT BLOCKING POP UPS PLUS

AdBlock Plus vs Ublock Origin: blocking effectiveness ADBLOCK PLUS VS UBLOCK ORIGIN: CPU CONSUMPTIONДuring lab tests, simulating normal ad blocking operations, we can see how uBlockВ is postulated as the most recommended option if we want to save on inverted processor time. If we move to Firefox, the result hardly changes.В The Ublock developer team has done a great job optimizing this add-on. Ublock, in its Origin 1.1.1 version, manages to save about 40% of system memory reserved for the browser.В Data corresponding to Chromium browsers in version 45.

ADBLOCK PLUS VS UBLOCK ORIGIN: CONSUMPTION OF RAM LetвЂ™s see below a comparison of the use of resources by the two most popular blockers currently. AdBlock Plus vs Ublock Origin: interface AdBlock Plus vs Ublock OriginДЄdBlock PlusВ works well, but itвЂ™s not perfect either.В It is not able to block some of the ads from Google, Microsoft, and other large companies.В Why?В Quite simply, these companies have paid the necessary price to keep their ads intact.В For its part, other websites with ads that are not intrusive or annoying, are included in the blockersвЂ™ whitelist -something that is logical, so as not to annoy the business of who offers you content, if it does it properly- and they also allow websites to be manually whitelisted by the user.ДЄdBlock Plus requires a lot of processing capacityВ to perform its task -both processor and RAM- and therefore it is not recommended for systems with limited resources.

Ublock origin not blocking pop ups